Why GH’s Choice of Nathan to Lead the Investigation Should Make Michael Nervous
Image Credit: ABC
Assigning Nathan to lead the case in General Hospital's investigation into Drew's shooting is a move that could potentially compromise Michael's rights and the integrity of the inquiry. By removing the usual distance between a suspect and an investigator, the show has created a unique challenge for Michael.
The investigation into Drew's shooting began with a sense of methodical calm, as if the PCPD was taking a measured approach. However, as the questioning intensified, Michael felt the pressure mounting. The key issue here is the person in charge of the investigation: Nathan.
Key Takeaways:
- Nathan was assigned to lead the search for evidence to support the claim that Michael shot Drew.
- He and Molly questioned Michael about his whereabouts on the night of the shooting.
- Nathan reported that there were no immediate red flags, which seemed reassuring at first.
- Nathan's prior history with Michael created a personal connection, blurring the lines of professionalism.
- Nathan's own unresolved past raises questions about his objectivity and potential biases.
The Familiarity Factor
Nathan (Ryan Paevey) was brought into the investigation without much ceremony and placed in charge of finding solid evidence. He and Molly (Kristen Vaganos) questioned Michael (Rory Gibson) about his whereabouts on the night of Drew's (Cameron Mathison) shooting.
The problem wasn't Nathan's behavior; it was the lack of distance. The history between Nathan and Michael, whether they liked it or not, created a complex dynamic. This familiarity has a tendency to cloud judgment, especially in situations that require objectivity.
What made the situation more concerning was Nathan's minimal follow-up. He told ADA Turner (Nazneen Contractor) that there were no obvious red flags, which seemed calm on the surface. However, this was the same person who decided what crossed the line in the first place.
The Objectivity Dilemma
Nathan's unresolved past, including gaps in his memory, adds a layer of complexity. These unanswered questions and unresolved years (https://soaphub.com/general-hospital/news-gh/nathans-memories-programming/) could influence his decision-making, even if he is back on the force. While this doesn't make him unreliable, it does make him human, and investigations often struggle with human imperfections.
Michael, unaware of the danger, felt the investigation had passed. However, Diane (Carolyn Hennesy) made it clear that the danger was far from over. All it would take was one piece of physical evidence, and Nathan, who now understood the contours of Michael's life, could be the one to find it.
The Impact of Familiarity
A stranger would need proof to turn suspicion into certainty. However, someone who knows you can start making connections early, noticing small shifts that might not mean much to others. Nathan, without needing a confession or a smoking gun, could already be narrowing down possibilities based on his perception of Michael's behavior.
This unique situation raises concerns about the fairness and integrity of the investigation. Michael's nervousness is not unfounded, given the potential for bias and the impact of Nathan's personal history on the case.
